Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39320488›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2024

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-reactive salivary antibody detection in South Carolina emergency healthcare workers, September 2019-March 2020.

Haley C Meltzer, Jane L Goodwin, Lauren A Fowler, Thomas W Britt, Ronald G Pirrallo, Jennifer T Grier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haley C MeltzerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.
Jane L GoodwinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.
Lauren A FowlerDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Thomas W BrittDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Ronald G PirralloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.
Jennifer T GrierDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-0280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On 19 January 2020, the first case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was identified in the United States, with the first cases in South Carolina confirmed on 06 March 2020. Due to initial limited testing capabilities and potential for asymptomatic transmission, it is possible that SARS-CoV-2 may have been present earlier than previously thought, while the immune status of at-risk populations was unknown. Saliva from 55 South Carolina emergency healthcare workers (EHCWs) was collected from September 2019 to March 2020, pre- and post-healthcare shifts, and stored frozen. To determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies, saliva-acquired post-shift was analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a repeat of positive or inconclusive results and follow-up testing of pre-shift samples. Two participants were positive for SARS-CoV-2 N/S1-reactive IgG, confirmed by follow-up testing, with S1 receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG present in one individual. Positive samples were collected from medical students working in emergency medical services (EMSs) in October or November 2019. The presence of detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 2019 suggests that immune responses to the virus existed in South Carolina, and the United States, in a small percentage of EHCWs prior to the earliest documented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. These findings suggest the feasibility of saliva as a noninvasive tool for surveillance of emerging outbreaks, and EHCWs represent a high-risk population that should be the focus of infectious disease surveillance.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19Health PersonnelSalivaSARS-CoV-2AdultEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth CarolinaYoung AdultAntibodies, Viralantibody surveillanceELISAemergency healthcare workerssalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39320488
PMCPMC11427973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.