ReviewPsychological medicine2024
Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital psychological interventions in youth with neurological disorders: a systematic review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Early emotional interventions for post-stroke functional prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Lived Experiences of Male Caregivers Supporting Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Depression and Epilepsy: A Call for Integrated Neuropsychiatric Care.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Integral Brain Health: a collaborative approach for psychiatry and neurology.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis: reply to Zhou et al.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor regarding 'Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis'.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- A network analysis of ego depletion and self-management in patients with epilepsy: differences across seizure frequencies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a digital health application (Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for improving symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders. A pre-registered systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Neurobite was performed from inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions in treating depression and/or anxiety among adults with neurological disorders were included. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed on categorical and continuous moderators, respectively. Main outcomes were pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety symptom scores, as reported using standardized measures. Fifty-four RCTs involving 5372 participants with 11 neurological disorders (including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, stroke) were included. The overall effect of interventions yielded significant improvements in both depression (57 arms, Hedges'
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.