Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Role of the Surgeon in De-Escalating Emotion During a Breast Cancer Surgery Consultation: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences in Alliance A231701CD.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03766009 (Increasing Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Making Through a Shared Decision Making Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Increasing Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Making Through a Shared Decision Making Intervention
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Providing information to prepare breast cancer patients for their surgical consultation: barriers and recommendations (an analysis from Alliance A231701CD).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Impact of breast cancer surgical procedures on postoperative daily life: a multicenter patient-reported outcomes study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients With Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis From Alliance A231701CD).Annals of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient engagement in decision making can improve satisfaction with care. Studies demonstrate that patients' emotional states can be significant barriers to engaging in shared decision making.
objectiveWe sought to examine how emotion associated with a breast cancer diagnosis impacts patient experiences during the surgical consultation, and explore opportunities for surgeons to mitigate the impact of emotion.
methodsWe conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with patients who participated in the decision aid arm of Alliance A231701CD, had low engagement, and experienced barriers to engagement. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze the interview data and organize it into overarching themes.
resultsParticipants recalled strong emotions with their diagnosis, describing it as devastating and shocking. Although several participants said that their emotional reaction to the diagnosis lessened over time, others expressed still feeling very anxious. Participants described ways in which their surgeon helped to de-escalate their emotional state, beginning with the establishment of rapport and continuing through treatment planning. Participants valued surgeons who they perceived to be personable and compassionate, treated them as an individual, provided reassuring and matter-of-fact information about their cancer, and efficiently communicated plans for next steps.
conclusionsPatients with breast cancer are often emotionally overwhelmed during their surgical consults, which impedes their ability to listen and participate in decision making. However, surgeon behaviors can help de-escalate emotions. Addressing emotion is critical to support patients in reaching a decision for breast cancer surgery and is likely to improve patient satisfaction with the decision process. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03766009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.