ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Normal, accessory, and aberrant branches of the common iliac artery: angiographic prevalence and clinical implications.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCatheter angiography remains essential to detect, characterize, and treat many vascular, traumatic, and neoplastic conditions affecting the pelvis, but the angiographic literature rarely mentions the common iliac artery (CIA) and its branches. The "normal" branches of the CIA principally consist of subangiographic rami supplying neighboring structures. Larger branches participate in the vascularization of the psoas muscle and the ureter. Less often, the CIA provides anomalous branches that complement or replace critical neighboring vessels. This study investigates the prevalence, type, and clinical relevance of CIA branches detectable during pelvic angiography.
methodsThis study analyzes the prevalence of CIA branches in 100 consecutive angiograms that included bilateral CIA injections as well as selective catheterizations of the median sacral artery, both L4 ISAs, and both internal iliac arteries. CIA branches were classified as normal (i.e., neither supplementing nor replacing a normal artery), accessory (i.e., supplementing a normal artery), or aberrant (i.e., replacing a normal artery).
resultsForty-three branches arose from 38 CIAs (19% of CIAs) in 30 patients (30% of patients), including 20 normal branches (46.5%), 21 aberrant branches (48.8%), and 2 accessory branches (4.7%). Each of the 15 patients with aberrant branches had at least one anomalous vessel capable of providing a radicular or radiculomedullary artery.
conclusionsCIA branches were present in 30% of patients undergoing spinal angiography. While most normal branches were diminutive and clinically irrelevant, CIAs also provided vessels able to vascularize pelvic and vertebral structures, including the spinal cord or a spinal vascular malformation in 16% of cases. Our study therefore confirms that CIA injections represent an essential component of pelvic and spinal angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39320387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.