Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39320361›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical microbiology2024

Current status of clinical trials for phage therapy.

Chidiebere F Uchechukwu, Adedayo Shonekan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Membrane-Focused Strategies AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Bacteria-phage infection network structure and genomic defence system content predict efficacy of a phage therapy cocktail againstPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chidiebere F UchechukwuWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Adedayo ShonekanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, bacteriophages have been considered alternatives to antibacterial treatments. Infectious diseases continue to plague the world because bacteria can adapt and develop defence mechanisms against antibiotics. The growing incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections necessitated the development of new techniques for treating bacterial infections worldwide. Clinical trials have shown efficiency against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, scientists in future clinical trials should scrutinize phage resistance implications, assess combination strategies with antimicrobial agents and address challenges in phage therapy delivery for effective implementation.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesClinical Trials as TopicPhage TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistancebacteriophage therapyclinical trialsinfectionsphage engineering

Identifiers

PMID39320361
PMCPMC11423923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.