ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2025
MRI for Rectal Cancer: Updates and Controversies-
Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- MST-Net: a multi-scale spatial transformation network for automated T2/T3 staging of rectal cancer on preoperative T2-weighted MRI.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- MRI Habitat Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Perineural Invasion and Prognostic Stratification in Rectal Cancer.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Challenges in rectal cancer MRI: from image acquisition to interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- [18 F]FDG PET unveils a cachexia-specific multiorgan metabolic phenotype and identifies patients with poor prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Developing and external validating a prediction model using machine learning and logistic regression: informing the surgical approach for robotic surgery based on preoperative MRI.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Potential Role of T2-Weighted Kurtosis in Improving Response Prediction of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer as Additional Tool Gained from Standard MRI Examination.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Multimodal Preoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Existing Guidelines.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Mastering rectal cancer MRI: From foundational concepts to optimal staging.European journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Low incidence of significant hydrogel spacer rectal wall infiltration: results from an experienced high-volume center.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rectal MRI is a critical tool in the care of patients with rectal cancer, having established roles for primary staging, restaging, and surveillance. The comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic information provided by MRI helps to optimize treatment decision-making. However, challenges persist in the standardization and interpretation of rectal MRI, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving treatment paradigms, including growing acceptance of nonoperative management. In this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.