ArticleRevista de saude publica2024
Determining RE-AIM indicators for evaluating the Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil (EAAB - Brazilian Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Strategy).
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decolonizing mental health: Rethinking implementation science from the ground up.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo confirm the diagram of the program's impact pathways and Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil (EAAB - Brazilian Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Strategy) core functions, and to determine indicators for evaluating EAAB.
methodsThis is a qualitative study within the field of implementation research. Data collection included two focus groups with EAAB implementers, document analysis, and literature review. The analysis included a review of the participants' suggestions and two stages of reviewing the diagram and the names of the impact pathways and core functions. Questions for evaluating the EAAB were then constructed based on the confirmed diagram. The indicators of the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) were adapted to the EAAB context. The evaluation questions were revised according to the RE-AIM domains and, finally, indicators were determined for each evaluation question.
resultsThis study advanced the analysis of EAAB implementation, defining 22 indicators for its monitoring and evaluation. Most of the indicators are already used in implementation, however, the analysis with the RE-AIM framework allowed the indicators to be updated to be more specific, measurable, and relevant to the desired objectives.
conclusionThe results of the study support the pragmatic application of RE-AIM evaluation in health programs and encourage the planning of evaluation indicators for other child health and development programs in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.