Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319922›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2024

Psychometric evaluation of the Intersectional Discrimination Index for use in Brazil.

Natália Peixoto Pereira, Carolina Saraiva de Macedo Lisboa, João Luiz Bastos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natália Peixoto PereiraPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-3796
Carolina Saraiva de Macedo LisboaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2199-9824
João Luiz BastosSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study evaluated the configural and metric structures of the Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI), an instrument that measures anticipated (InDI-A), dat-to-day (InDI-D), and major (InDI-M) discrimination. Data from a broader study, focused on the impacts of discrimination on the mental health of women living in Brazil, were used. Approximately 1,000 women, selected according to a convenience sampling scheme, answered the InDI and questions about sociodemographic characteristics in an electronic form that was administered in 2021. Exploratory factor analyses and exploratory structural equation modeling were applied to the first half of the sample; for the second, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Taken together, the findings suggest that each of the three measures is one-dimensional. However, unlike the study that originally proposed the InDI for use in Canada and the United States, we observed the presence of residual correlations in the three subscales evaluated, all of which were suggestive of content redundancy between specific pairs of items. The three measures showed moderate to strong factor loadings and acceptable fit to the data. InDI exhibited reasonable internal validity, potentially becoming a valuable instrument for investigating the health effects of intersectional discrimination in Brazil. Future studies should evaluate the consistency of these findings, examine the scalar structure of the instrument, and analyze its invariance among different marginalized groups.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocial DiscriminationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39319922
PMCPMC11423766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.