ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2024
Anterior-interrupted and posterior-continuous suture technique improved the success rate of kidney transplantation model in rats.
Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal vessel-assisted anastomosis improves the abdominal heart transplant model in rats without bilateral lower limb ischemia.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to introduce and evaluate two new microvascular anastomosis techniques compared to the conventional method in a rat renal transplant model.
methodsUsing a Fisher-to-Lewis rat kidney transplantation model, the renal artery anastomosis was performed using the interrupted (I) suture technique, Y-shaped continuous (Y) suture technique, and anterior-interrupted and posterior-continuous (I-C) suture technique. The rats were then divided into three groups: I group, Y group, and I-C group. Parameters such as arterial anastomosis time, warm ischemia time, seven-day survival rate of the rats, and vessel histopathology were assessed.
resultsThe mean arterial anastomosis time, blood leakage scores, and warm ischemia time were significantly reduced in groups Y and I-C compared to group I. Moreover, the seven-day survival rate was significantly higher in the I-C group compared to the other two groups. Arterial histopathology demonstrated vessel wall recovery without damage in all three groups, suggesting the safety of both Y and I-C techniques.
conclusionsThe anterior-interrupted and posterior-continuous suture method is particularly beneficial for small artery reconstruction in organ transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.