Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319897›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2024

RATIO OF METASTATIC LYMPH NODES VS. RESECTED LYMPH NODES (N-RATIO) HAS PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS IN GASTRIC CANCER.

Breno Cordeiro Porto, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos, André Roncon Dias, Fábio Pinatel Lopasso, Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: what factors influence the prognosis?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Breno Cordeiro PortoUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-4089
Marina Alessandra PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-0988
Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille RamosUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-7858
André Roncon DiasUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-6379
Fábio Pinatel LopassoUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0075-3016
Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'AlbuquerqueUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-7168
Ulysses Ribeiro JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Medicine, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-7347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node status is vital for gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, but the conventional pN stage may be limited by variations in lymphadenectomy and stage migration. The N-Ratio, which assesses the ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes, emerges as a promising prognostic tool.

aimsTo assess N-Ratios prognostic value in GC, particularly in patients with <25 resected lymph nodes.

methodsPatients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent for GC were retrospectively evaluated. The N-Ratio categories were determined using the ROC curve method, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of performance in predicting recurrence/death.

resultsA total of 561 GC patients were included in the study, 57% had pN+ status, and 17.5% had <25 resected lymph nodes. N-Ratio, with a mean of 0.12, predicted survival with 74% accuracy (AUC=0.74; 95%CI 0.70-0.78, p<0.001). N-Ratio categories included: N-Ratio 0 (43%); N-Ratio 1 (12.3%); N-Ratio 2 (31.6%); and N-Ratio 3 (13.2%). Disease-free survival (DFS) varied among all N-Ratio groups, with N-Ratio 3 showing worse survival than pN3 cases (DFS=21.8 vs. 11 months, p=0.022, p<0.05). In cases with <25 resected lymph nodes, DFS was not significantly worse in N-Ratio 0 (68.8 vs. 81.9%, p=0.061, p>0.05) and N-Ratio 1 (66.2 vs. 50%, p=0.504, p>0.05) groups. The DFS of N-Ratio-0 cases with <25 lymph nodes was similar to N-Ratio 1 cases.

conclusionsN-Ratio influenced survival in GC patients, especially in advanced lymph node disease (N-Ratio 3). Considering that N-Ratio does not impact pN0 cases, individualized prognosis assessment is essential for patients with <25 resected lymph nodes.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymph Node RatioLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39319897
PMCPMC11419286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.