Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319807›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2024

Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Study.

Michael B Henry, Emily Funsten, Marisa A Michealson, Danielle Albright, Cameron S Crandall, David P Sklar, Naomi George, Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael B HenryCreighton University Arizona Health Education Alliance, Maricopa Emergency Medicine Residency, Phoenix, Arizona.
Emily FunstenUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Marisa A MichealsonUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Danielle AlbrightUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Cameron S CrandallUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
David P SklarUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Naomi GeorgeUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Margaret Greenwood-EricksenUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K08 HS029038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The United States lacks a national interfacility patient transfer coordination system. During the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many hospitals were overwhelmed and faced difficulties transferring sick patients, leading some states and cities to form transfer centers intended to assist sending facilities. In this study we aimed to explore clinician experiences with newly implemented transfer coordination centers. Methods: This mixed-methods study used a brief national survey along with in-depth interviews. The American College of Emergency Physicians Emergency Medicine Practice Research Network (EMPRN) administered the national survey in March 2021. From September-December 2021, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with administrators and rural emergency clinicians in Arizona and New Mexico, two states that started transfer centers during COVID-19. Results: Among 141 respondents (of 765, 18.4% response rate) to the national EMPRN survey, only 30% reported implementation or expansion of a transfer coordination center during COVID-19. Those with new transfer centers reported no change in difficulty of patient transfers during COVID-19 while those without had increased difficulty. The 17 qualitative interviews expanded upon this, revealing four major themes: 1) limited resources for facilitating transfers even before COVID-19; 2) increased number of and distance to transfer partners during the COVID-19 pandemic; 3) generally positive impacts of transfer centers on workflow, and 4) the potential for continued use of centers to facilitate transfers. Conclusion: Transfer centers may have offset pandemic-related transfer challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinicians who frequently need to transfer patients may particularly benefit from ongoing access to such transfer coordination services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient TransferArizonaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInterviews as TopicNew MexicoPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39319807
PMCPMC11418862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.