Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319610›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Plasma Cell-Free DNA Concentration and Fragmentomes Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Cervical Cancer Patients.

Ting Peng, Haiqiang Zhang, Lingguo Li, Canhui Cao, Miaochun Xu, Xiaojie Liu, Shitong Lin, Ping Wu, Tian Chu, Binghan Liu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ting PengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Haiqiang ZhangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Lingguo LiCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Canhui CaoNational Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Miaochun XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Xiaojie LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Shitong LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Ping WuNational Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Tian ChuNational Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Binghan LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Yashi XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Yan ZhangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Yeqin WangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Jinjin YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Medical College, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214000, China.
Wencheng DingNational Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Xin JinBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-7663

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2701201National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2701203National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072895National Natural Science Foundation of China 82103134National Natural Science Foundation of China 82141106National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203453Young Fund Cultivation Project, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2023B30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies. However, biomarkers for more precise patient care are an unmet need. Herein, the concentration of 285 plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples are analyzed from 84 cervical patients and the clinical significance of cfDNA fragmentomic characteristics across the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) treatment. Patients with poor NACT response exhibit a significantly greater escalation in cfDNA levels following the initial cycle of treatment, in comparison to patients with a favorable response. Distinctive end motif profiles and promoter coverages of cfDNA in initial plasma are observed between patients with differing NACT responses. Notably, the DNASE1L3 analysis further demonstrates the intrinsic association between cfDNA characteristics and chemotherapy resistance. The cfDNA and motif ratios show a good discriminative capacity for predicting non-responders from responders (area under the curve (AUC) > 0.8). In addition, transcriptional start sites (TSS) coverages around promoters discern the alteration of biological processes associated with chemotherapy resistance and reflect the potential value in predicting chemotherapy response. These findings in predictive biomarkers may optimize treatment selection, minimize unnecessary treatment, and assist in establishing personalized treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsNeoadjuvant TherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic Acidsbiomarkercell‐free DNAcervical cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39319610
PMCPMC11578340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.