ReviewAnnals of neurology2024
Survey of the Landscape of Society Practice Guidelines for Genetic Testing of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
Review in Annals of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Counselor Utilization Across Non-Genetics Departments for Neurodevelopmental Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Novel Genetic Variants Associated with Unexplained Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Health-related social needs and referrals for genetic evaluation among young children.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Monogenic defects in Russian children with autism spectrum disorders.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Precision diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- ZNRF3 in neurodevelopmental disorders: insights into Wnt signaling and therapeutic potential.Neurogenetics · 2025Review
- Novel Compound Heterozygous Variants in ZNF526 Causing Dentici-Novelli Neurodevelopmental Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing of patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) is critical for diagnosis, medical management, and access to precision therapies. Because genetic testing approaches evolve rapidly, professional society practice guidelines serve an essential role in guiding clinical care; however, several challenges exist regarding the creation and equitable implementation of these guidelines. In this scoping review, we assessed the current state of United States professional societies' guidelines pertaining to genetic testing for unexplained global developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and cerebral palsy. We describe several identified shortcomings and argue the need for a unified, frequently updated, and easily-accessible cross-specialty society guideline. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:900-913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.