ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of local and contemporary systemic treatment approaches on clinical outcome.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of local consolidative therapy combined with systemic therapy in driver-negative oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Management of potentially curable colorectal lung metastases with synchronous systemic therapy and percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and either limited or extensive synchronous metastatic spread in Germany-a population-based cancer registry cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Transforming the Management of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Insights on Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Review
- Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of local and contemporary systemic treatment approaches on clinical outcome.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Oligometastatic NSCLC: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer with radiotherapy - single-centre experience.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025Article
- Circulating TERT serves as the novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for the resectable NSCLC.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oligometastatic (OMD) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct but heterogeneous entity. Current guidelines recommend systemic therapy and consolidation with local ablative therapy (LAT). However, evidence regarding the optimal choice of multimodal treatment approaches is lacking, in particular with respect to the integration of immunotherapy. This real-world study identified 218 patients with OMD NSCLC (2004-2023, prespecified criteria: ≤5 metastases in ≤2 organ systems) from three major German comprehensive cancer centers. Most patients had one (72.5%) or two (17.4%) metastatic lesions in a single (89.9%) organ system. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with a single metastatic lesion (HR 0.54, p = .003), and female gender (HR 0.4, p < .001). Median OS of the full cohort was 27.8 months, with 29% survival at 5 years. Patients who had completed LAT to all NSCLC sites, typically excluding patients with early progression, had a median OS of 34.4 months (37.7% 5-year OS rate) with a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 10.9 months (13.3% at 5 years). In those patients, systemic treatment as part of first-line therapy was associated with doubling of RFS (12.3 vs. 6.4 months, p < .001). Despite limited follow-up of patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy (EU approval 2018/2019), RFS was greatly improved by adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy (HR 0.44, p = .008, 2-year RFS 51.4% vs. 15.1%). In conclusion, patients with OMD NSCLC benefitted from multimodality approaches integrating systemic therapy and local ablation of all cancer sites. A substantial proportion of patients achieved extended OS, suggesting a potential for cure that can be further augmented with the addition of immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.