ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024
The phase coherence of cortical oscillations predicts dynamic changes in perceived visibility.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic reorganization of functional networks underlying audiovisual interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The phase synchronization of brain oscillations plays an important role in visual processing, perceptual awareness, and performance. Yet, the cortical mechanisms underlying modulatory effects of post-stimulus phase coherence and frequency-specific oscillations associated with different aspects of vision are still subject to debate. In this study, we aimed to identify the post-stimulus phase coherence of cortical oscillations associated with perceived visibility and contour discrimination. We analyzed electroencephalogram data from two masking experiments where target visibility was manipulated by the contrast ratio or polarity of the mask under various onset timing conditions (stimulus onset asynchronies, SOAs). The behavioral results indicated an SOA-dependent suppression of target visibility due to masking. The time-frequency analyses revealed significant modulations of phase coherence over occipital and parieto-occipital regions. We particularly identified modulations of phase coherence in the (i) 2-5 Hz frequency range, which may reflect feedforward-mediated contour detection and sustained visibility; and (ii) 10-25 Hz frequency range, which may be associated with suppressed visibility through inhibitory interactions between and within synchronized neural pathways. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that oscillatory phase alignments, not only in the pre-stimulus but also in the post-stimulus window, play a crucial role in shaping perceived visibility and dynamic vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.