In one paragraphArticle in Toxicology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
7 authors.
Rui HuangGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9985-5894 Shaowei ChenGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-0411 Ping WangGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5673-6631 Pan ZhuNational Reference Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Surveillance for Heavy Metal, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1340-7531 Xiumin XuNational Reference Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Surveillance for Heavy Metal, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9292-5958 Zihui ChenGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0964-4332 Jiewen PengGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.160 Qunxian Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511430, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0837-6753 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
food and medicine homologyheavy metalsprobabilistic risk assessmentsPrunella vulgaris@risk
Identifiers
PMID39319344
PMCPMC11420550
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390