Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319246›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2024

Effectiveness of a single dose of JYNNEOS vaccine in real world: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amira Mohamed Taha, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud, Khaled Abouelmagd, Sara Adel Abdelkader Saed, Basma Badrawy Khalefa, Sangam Shah, Prakasini Satapathy, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Sanjit Sah, Hashem Abu Serhan and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amira Mohamed TahaFaculty of Medicine Fayoum University Fayoum Egypt.
Abdelrahman Mohamed MahmoudFaculty of Medicine Menoufia University Menoufia Egypt.
Khaled AbouelmagdCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine Al-Azhar University Cairo Egypt.
Sara Adel Abdelkader SaedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy MOH Cairo Egypt.
Basma Badrawy KhalefaFaculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt.
Sangam ShahInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kirtipur Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-8203-3329
Prakasini SatapathyCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha University Chennai India.
Muhammad Aaqib ShamimDepartment of Pharmacology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Sanjit SahDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth Pune Maharashtra India.
Hashem Abu SerhanDepartment of Ophthalmology Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2953-2188
Suzanne DonovanDepartment of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Ranjit SahDepartment of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-8714
Joshuan J BarbozaEscuela de Medicina Universidad César Vallej Trujillo Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mpox infection is a zoonotic illness that resembles smallpox. Vaccination is widely regarded as a vital effective method of preventing mpox, however, there is lack of consensus of effectiveness of a single dose of mpox vaccine in the current 2022-2023 outbreak. We pooled data from real-world studies to evaluate the efficacy of the JYNNEOS vaccination given as a single dosage. Method: We carried out a thorough literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up until August 2023. We estimated the pooled vaccine effectiveness (VE) for mpox using inverse variance method in a random-effects meta-analysis. We expressed the results as VE, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and 95% prediction interval (95% PI) using R v4.3.0. We assessed influence, heterogeneity contribution, and influence of studies using several tests and conducted sensitivity analysis accordingly. We used Doi plot and Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index to evaluate publication bias. Results: With a total sample size of 35,326 individuals, we involved 11 studies in the meta-analysis. The VE of a single dose of JYNNEOS vaccine was 78.23% (95% CI: 62.79%-87.27%) by pooling data of 24,784 individuals over seven studies. The findings were heterogenous with a 95% PI of -32.14% to 96.41% depicting the expected range of VE in similar settings. Notably, VE increased to 83.02% (74.62%-88.64%) with a prediction interval of (44.67%-94.79) after sensitivity analysis by leaving out outliers. The results were robust in light of several sensitivity analyses. An asymmetric Doi plot with LFK index of -2.25 showed potential publication bias. Pooled prevalence of mpox infection among vaccinated individuals (breakthrough infection) in six studies was 2.19% (0.37%-5.32%). Conclusion: The present findings provide compelling evidence that a single dose of JUNNEOS vaccine can protect recipients from mpox infection. With a 78.23% estimated efficacy rate, the vaccine is thought to be a useful tool in preventing further spread of mpox. However, more research and ongoing surveillance are required to fully understand the reasons behind breakthrough infections and to improve immunization strategies for better protection against mpox.

Indexed as

effectivenessJYNNEOSMpox: vaccineMPXV

Identifiers

PMID39319246
PMCPMC11420512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.