ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Management of severe capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular toxicities associated with anticancer drug therapy in Asian patients: a literature review and practical management recommendations for non-ophthalmologic settings.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Bilateral optic disc edema with papillophlebitis-like features following combined cisplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of severe capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity. Observations: A 71-year-old woman presented with severe bilateral vision loss. Four months earlier, capecitabine was initiated for a metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma. Biomicroscopy revealed bilateral whorl-like corneal epitheliopathy accompanied by metaplasia, keratinization and subepithelial fibrosis. After consulting the treating oncologist, capecitabine treatment was discontinued. Initially, a non-surgical approach was adopted and intensive topical dexamethasone treatment was applied. Despite capecitabine discontinuation and topical steroid treatment, visual acuity progressively declined. Bilateral corneal scraping and bandage contact lens fitting was performed. This resulted in significant improvement of visual acuity, corneal surface regularity and quality of life. Conclusion and importance: We report the first case of severe visual impairment due to capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity. Early corneal scraping, especially when confronted with profound vision loss, may yield better outcomes compared to relying on spontaneous recovery after capecitabine discontinuation. Patients experiencing ocular discomfort and vision loss, while receiving capecitabine therapy, should be referred for semi-urgent ophthalmological examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.