ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024
Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Blunt Chest Trauma.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the most common treatments for patients with blunt chest trauma (BCT) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our study aimed to investigate the performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting the prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (PDMV) in patients with BCT. Methods: In this single-center observational study, patients with BCT who were treated with MV through nasal or oral intubation were selected. PDMV was defined as the duration of mechanical ventilation ≥7 days after endotracheal intubation (normal vs prolonged MV; dichotomous outcomes). K-means was used to cluster data from the original cohort by an unsupervised learning method. Multiple machine learning algorithms were used to predict DMV categories. The most significant predictors were identified by feature importance analysis. Finally, a decision tree based on the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm was developed to study the cutoff points of predictors in clinical decision-making. Results: A total of 426 patients and 35 characteristics were included. K-means clustering divided the cohort into two clusters (high risk and low risk). The area under the curve (AUC) of the DMV classification algorithms ranged from 0.753 to 0.923. The importance analysis showed that the volume of pulmonary contusion (VPC) was the most important feature to predict DMV. The prediction accuracy of the decision tree based on CHAID reached 86.4%. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can predict PDMV in patients with BCT. Therefore, limited medical resources can be more appropriately allocated to BCT patients at risk for PDMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.