Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319130›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Comparison of commercial DNA kits for allergen detection of celery in food matrices.

Marleen M Voorhuijzen-Harink, Bas J Fronen, Linda Willemsen, Andries Koops, Elise F Hoek-van den Hil, Nathalie G E Smits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marleen M Voorhuijzen-HarinkWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Bas J FronenWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Linda WillemsenWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Andries KoopsWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Elise F Hoek-van den HilWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Nathalie G E SmitsWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For correct allergen risk management by industry, retail and food safety authorities, sensitive and reliable fast allergen detection methods are required, even more when precautionary allergen labelling based on reference doses will be implemented in legislation. This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of three commercially available quantitative or qualitative test kits, for DNA analysis of celery in food products. Five product groups, representing different sectors of the AOAC food-matrix triangle, being (plant-based) meat products, snacks, sauces, dried herbs and spices, and smoothies, were identified to potentially contain celery. From each group, blank and incurred (labelled to contain celery) food products were selected, of which the blank food products were additionally spiked with low protein levels of celery prior to qPCR assessment. Results show that the assessed test kits perform according to their specifications, however, a clear influence of the matrix on the detection ability of celery was observed. In addition, quantification of the amount of celery in the different food products showed to be challenging in all food product groups using the two quantification kits.

Identifiers

PMID39319130
PMCPMC11419853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.