Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319097›Full record

ReviewBJA open2024

Effect of neuromodulation for chronic pain on the autonomic nervous system: a systematic review.

Bart Billet, Lisa Goudman, Philippe Rigoard, Maxime Billot, Manuel Roulaud, Sören Verstraete, Werner Nagels, Maarten Moens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bart BilletPain Clinic, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Lisa GoudmanSTIMULUS Research Group, Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N) and Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe RigoardPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) and Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Maxime BillotPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) and Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Manuel RoulaudPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery) and Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Sören VerstraeteDepartment of Anesthesia, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Werner NagelsPain Clinic, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Maarten MoensSTIMULUS Research Group, Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N) and Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of neuromodulation as an alternative treatment option for chronic pain. Neuromodulation techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and peripheral nerve stimulation, have shown promising results in the management of various chronic pain conditions and involve targeted modulation of neural activity to alleviate pain and restore functional capacity. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial role in the regulation of various bodily functions including pain perception. However, the effects of neuromodulation on the ANS in the context of chronic pain remain poorly understood. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the existing literature about the effects of neuromodulation on the ANS in chronic pain settings. Methods: Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science). The study protocol was registered before initiation of the review process. The Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate risk of bias. Results: A total of 43 studies were included, of which only one was an animal study. Several studies have reported more than one outcome parameter in the same population of chronic pain patients. Cardiovascular parameters were the most frequently used outcomes. More specifically, 18 outcome parameters were revealed to evaluate the function of the ANS, namely heart rate variability ( Conclusions: There are indications that neuromodulation alters the ANS, supported by high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence, however, heterogeneity in ANS outcome measures drives towards inconclusive results. Further research is warranted to elucidate the indirect or direct mechanisms of action on the ANS, with a potential benefit for optimisation of patient selection for these interventions. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42021297287).

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systemchronic painelectrical stimulationneuromodulationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39319097
PMCPMC11419894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.