ArticleERJ open research2024
Prevalence of refractory and unexplained chronic cough in adults treated in cough centre.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and Burdens in Refractory Chronic Cough: Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors for refractory and untreated chronic cough in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- KAAACI Consensus Document on the Goals and Standards of Chronic Cough Clinics in Korea: A Delphi Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational
- Neurogenic cough in CANVAS syndrome: objective cough monitoring reveals a distinctive clinical pattern.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- When Refractory Is Not the End: Redefining Chronic Cough Through Tertiary Center Evaluation.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Real-World patterns of Korean medicine and combined Korean-Western medicine use in patients with chronic cough at Korean medicine institutions: a nationwide cohort study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Female predominance in chronic cough: biological sex-related factors, mechanisms, and therapeutic targets-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The NEuroCOUGH Chronic Cough Registry: a protocol for a pan-European observational study.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Association of throat sensation severity with quality of life in patients with chronic cough.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Disease finds its identity with treatment in the real world: the use of gefapixant in chronic cough.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- How Will a Treatable Traits Approach Reshape Clinical Practice in Chronic Cough?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Review
- The McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire (MCSQ): a cough severity instrument for patients with refractory chronic cough.The European respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Emotions in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a multicenter, non-interventional study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough pose significant clinical challenges, impairing patients' quality of life. However, a precise definition of refractory chronic cough remains elusive. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of refractory and unexplained chronic cough among patients referred to our cough centre and to analyse the prevalence of refractory chronic cough relative to its definition. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all patients who were diagnosed at a cough clinic between 2018 and 2022. The response to therapy was measured based on reduction in cough severity ( Results: Of 201 patients treated for chronic cough, only three (1.5%) were diagnosed with unexplained chronic cough. Among 166 patients monitored for therapy response, 71 (42.8%) experienced a cough severity reduction of ≥30 mm on the visual analogue scale, while 100 (60.2%) showed an improvement of ≥1.5 points on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Based on the basic refractory chronic cough definition, 51 of 166 patients (30.7%) were diagnosed with refractory chronic cough. If applying stricter criteria (persistent severe cough (≥40 mm on the visual analogue scale), insufficient therapy response (<30 mm reduction on the visual analogue scale) and <1.5-point improvement on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire), 45 of 166 patients (27.1%) would be diagnosed with refractory chronic cough. Conclusions: Refractory chronic cough is common in patients referred to cough clinics. The prevalence of refractory chronic cough differs slightly depending on the diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the definition of refractory chronic cough used in routine practice needs to be clarified.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.