Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39319047›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Prevalence of refractory and unexplained chronic cough in adults treated in cough centre.

Paweł Kukiełka, Katarzyna Moliszewska, Katarzyna Białek-Gosk, Elżbieta M Grabczak, Marta Dąbrowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. When Refractory Is Not the End: Redefining Chronic Cough Through Tertiary Center Evaluation.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paweł KukiełkaStudent's Scientific Group "Alveolus", Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna MoliszewskaStudent's Scientific Group "Alveolus", Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Białek-GoskDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Elżbieta M GrabczakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-118X
Marta DąbrowskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-7737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough pose significant clinical challenges, impairing patients' quality of life. However, a precise definition of refractory chronic cough remains elusive. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of refractory and unexplained chronic cough among patients referred to our cough centre and to analyse the prevalence of refractory chronic cough relative to its definition. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all patients who were diagnosed at a cough clinic between 2018 and 2022. The response to therapy was measured based on reduction in cough severity ( Results: Of 201 patients treated for chronic cough, only three (1.5%) were diagnosed with unexplained chronic cough. Among 166 patients monitored for therapy response, 71 (42.8%) experienced a cough severity reduction of ≥30 mm on the visual analogue scale, while 100 (60.2%) showed an improvement of ≥1.5 points on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Based on the basic refractory chronic cough definition, 51 of 166 patients (30.7%) were diagnosed with refractory chronic cough. If applying stricter criteria (persistent severe cough (≥40 mm on the visual analogue scale), insufficient therapy response (<30 mm reduction on the visual analogue scale) and <1.5-point improvement on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire), 45 of 166 patients (27.1%) would be diagnosed with refractory chronic cough. Conclusions: Refractory chronic cough is common in patients referred to cough clinics. The prevalence of refractory chronic cough differs slightly depending on the diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the definition of refractory chronic cough used in routine practice needs to be clarified.

Identifiers

PMID39319047
PMCPMC11417602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.