ArticleERJ open research2024
Patients at risk of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease who need testing evaluated using a modified Delphi process by European experts.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms ofBreathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary management of interstitial lung disease in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an Italian Delphi consensus.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Testing in Patients with Chronic Lung Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2025 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying patients at risk of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is challenging. Delays in NTM-PD identification and management are associated with declining lung function and increased morbidity and mortality. Study design and methods: European NTM-PD experts (n=12) participated in a three-round modified Delphi process to score symptoms and comorbidities potentially associated with NTM-PD as reasons to test for nontuberculous mycobacteria. Results: Experts reached a consensus on the symptoms and comorbidities that should and should not prompt testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria. Requirements for testing were scored as high (mean ≥7), medium (mean ≥4-<7) or low (mean <4). Nontuberculous mycobacteria testing should be undertaken when multiple suggestive symptoms are present simultaneously in all patients except those with cancer (7.3-8.8), or when radiology is indicative of NTM-PD (≥8.9). Symptoms of persistent sputum production, recurrent respiratory infection and haemoptysis should prompt testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria, particularly in those with underlying respiratory diseases. Symptomatic patients with bronchiectasis or previous tuberculosis/NTM-PD or those being prescribed or undergoing long-term macrolide therapy for a respiratory condition should also be tested. Testing is not warranted in patients without an underlying respiratory disorder or in those without a history of respiratory disorders unless presenting with multiple symptoms. Conclusions: Assessing patients' risk of NTM-PD is challenging. This Delphi consensus process provides insight into symptoms and clinical characteristics that should prompt NTM-PD assessment. Timely testing and diagnosis would enable initiation of appropriate management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.