ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2024
Umbilical arterial blood lactate as predictor of early neonatal outcome and evaluation of intrapartum asphyxia.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Areca Nut Chewing as a Modifiable Risk Factor for Maternal Anemia, Prematurity and Fetal Low Birth Weight: A Cross Sectional Study in Teluk Wondama, West Papua.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Evaluating predictive values of umbilical cord arterial lactate for adverse newborn outcomes among term-births in northern Uganda: A cross sectional analytical study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Lactate, an Essential Metabolic Marker in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal asphyxia is a leading cause of under-5 mortality and exerts great pressure on the health system. Adequate foetal monitoring in labour is paramount in the early detection of foetal distress to prevent perinatal asphyxia. Several methods of foetal monitoring are in use with varying efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy of umbilical arterial (UA) lactate assay in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Methodology: This was a prospective longitudinal study involving 160 pregnant women in the active phase of labour at term who met the inclusion criteria. They were recruited using a consecutive sampling technique and underwent a cardiotocography. Then they were classified into normal and abnormal cardiotocographic groups. At delivery, the UA blood of all of the babies was collected and assayed for serum lactate, and the levels were correlated with the perinatal outcome. The perinatal outcomes were measured by Apgar scores, admission into the neonatal unit, and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Analysis was done to determine the sensitivity and specificity of UA lactate in predicting birth asphyxia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, and neonatal unit admission. Results: The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) between the two cardiotocography (CTG) groups, normal years (30.55 ± 5.59) and abnormal years (29.86 ± 5.51), were similar. A critical UA lactate concentration > 9.1 mmol/L predicted Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min with a sensitivity and specificity of 76.47% (CI: 50.1-93.2) and 91.55% (CI: 85.7-95.6%), respectively. Also, the need for neonatal unit admission was predicted at a cut-off point >9.1 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 61.90% (CI: 38.4-81.9) and specificity of 91.30% (CI: 85.3-95.4). Umbilical artery lactate levels > 11.2 mmol/L predicted the development of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in neonates with a sensitivity of 100% (CI: 39.8-100.0) and specificity of 88.39% (CI: 82.3-93.0). Conclusion: Umbilical artery lactate correlates with adverse pregnancy outcomes and is an excellent tool for predicting adverse neonatal outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.