Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318949›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The More You See, the More Confusion: Two Cases of Pneumonia With Confusing Imaging Findings of Adenocarcinoma.

Ma D Valdes Bracamontes, Gangacharan R Dubey

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ma D Valdes BracamontesPulmonary and Critical Care, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA.
Gangacharan R DubeyPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Veterans Affairs New York (VA NY) Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging studies are a helpful tool when facing pulmonary pathology. While a specific radiologic pattern suggests a diagnosis, a multidisciplinary approach is ideal. Pneumonia and lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. LADC has many patterns on computed tomography (CT); when it manifests as parenchymal consolidation, it is often difficult to distinguish from pneumonia, leading to a delayed or erroneous diagnosis. To achieve a definite diagnosis, clinical information, imaging, and laboratory findings are required. We present two cases that illustrate the importance of applying image interpretation to clinical context. In the first case CT was suspicious for pulmonary malignancy, after a failed response to antibiotics, subsequent invasive interventions led to infection dissemination and complicated clinical course. In the second case, CT showed similar imaging findings to those observed in case one. In case two, however, a conservative approach led to optimal outcomes and improved quality of care.

Indexed as

ground-glass opacities (ggo)left upper lobe (lul)lung adenocarcinoma (ladc)pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma (pladc)right upper lobe (rul)suv (standardized uptake value)

Identifiers

PMID39318949
PMCPMC11420613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.