Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318854›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2024

An overview of decision-making in cerebrovascular treatment strategies: Part II - Ruptured aneurysms.

Georges Versyck, Johannes van Loon, Robin Lemmens, Jelle Demeestere, Lawrence Bonne, Jo P Peluso, Steven De Vleeschouwer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georges VersyckDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johannes van LoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robin LemmensDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jelle DemeestereDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lawrence BonneDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jo P PelusoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven De VleeschouwerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Decision-making for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms is an intricate process, which involves several factors. There has been a rapid advancement in endovascular, but also in the surgical treating field of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, with a growing body of evidence for either treatment technique. Research question: As there is a wide variety of treatment possibilities, it can be hard to understand the intricacies which lie behind the decision-making process for a given aneurysm. Materials and methods: An overview of the most relevant literature in decision-making on ruptured intracranial aneurysms is given. Results: Different decision-altering factors were identified, which can be divided into information from the general evidence, to influential factors such as the patient's age, initial presenting status, and aneurysmal factors such as size, morphology and aneurysmal location. Discussion and conclusion: This review provides an evidence-based overview of the most pertinent literature on these different aspects of decision-making in ruptured aneurysm cases and provides some recommendations after each of these segments. As always, all different aspects of the patient and aneurysmal factors should be taken into consideration before coming to a conclusion, as to obtain the best possible result for an individual patient.

Indexed as

Decision-makingEndovascular therapyMicrosurgical clippingRuptured intracranial aneurysmSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID39318854
PMCPMC11421264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.