ReviewBrain & spine2024
Review of current treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular aneurysms of the basilar apex.
Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed mass effect following endovascular coiling of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: Mechanism and treatment strategy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Treatment strategies for subarachnoid hemorrhage in a distal basilar dolichoectatic aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Delayed posterior tilting of a giant basilar tip aneurysm following stent-assisted coiling with therapeutic P1 occlusion: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Symptoms, Imaging Features, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes of Patients with Top of the Basilar Artery Syndrome: Experiences from a Comprehensive Stroke Center.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Review of treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular posterior cerebral artery aneurysms.Brain & spine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Giant aneurysms of the basilar apex represent formidable challenges as the high rupture rate of untreated lesions must be balanced against the technical complexity and potential morbidity of intervention. Research question: Review of treatment modalities and outcomes of patients harboring giant (>2.5 cm) basilar apex saccular aneurysms, in an effort to refine treatment decision-making. Material and methods: A systematic literature review through the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify cases of giant basilar apex saccular aneurysms treated either microsurgically or endovascularly. Patients' demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, angiographic and clinical outcomes as well as follow-up information were obtained. Results: Data from 32 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria, including 49 patients (32 treated surgically and 17 endovascularly) was obtained. Mean patient age at presentation was 51.69 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:2. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 30.57 mm. A favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was reported on 70.6% of endovascular and 56.3% of open surgical cases. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 55.6% of the open and 23.5% of the endovascular cases. Death rate was 33% for endovascular and 15.6% for open cases; the higher mortality of endovascular treatment is mainly attributed to the mass effect from continued brainstem compression after treatment. Discussion and conclusion: Higher rates of complete occlusion but higher morbidity are associated with microsurgery compared to endovascular modalities. Severe, clinically apparent brainstem mass effect may require decompression associated with microsurgery, when technically feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.