ArticleHeliyon2024
Preoperative risk factors for prolonged length of stay after bullectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prolonged length of stay (LOS) increases the economic burden on patients, therefore, optimizing LOS is a critical clinical challenge for physicians. This study aims to examine the correlation between the postoperative LOS and surgery-related adverse events after bullectomy. We defined prolonged postoperative LOS after bullectomy and analyzed the preoperative risk factors linked to prolonged LOS. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed patient data from thoracoscopic bullectomy performed at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the optimal cut-off values defining prolonged LOS after bullectomy. It was then characterized as prolonged LOS. Patients were divided into prolonged and normal LOS groups based on their postoperative duration. Further, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify preoperative risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative LOS after bullectomy. Results: Among the 152 patients analyzed, binary logistic regression revealed a significant effect of surgery-related adverse events after bullectomy on the LOS (P < 0.001). A postoperative LOS exceeding 3 days was considered prolonged. Among the 152 patients, 38.2 % (58/152) experienced a prolonged LOS out of which 20.4 % (31/152) developed surgery-related adverse events. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative risk factors associated with prolonged LOS included age ≥60 years (OR = 3.052, 95%CI 1.226-7.586, P = 0.016), current smoking status (OR = 2.754, 95%CI 1.482-6.346, P = 0.025), and ASA grade 3 (OR = 4.783, 95%CI 2.356-9.131, P = 0.003). Conclusion: In summary, the postoperative length of stay beyond 3 days after bullectomy was considered prolonged. The preoperative risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative stays after bullectomy included age (over 60), current smoking, and grade 3 ASA. Therefore, quick identification and intervention in patients with these high-risk factors may promote rapid recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.