ArticleTrauma case reports2024
Intraocular eyelash in anterior chamber following penetrating trauma and self-sealing corneal laceration: Case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraocular foreign bodies pose a significant clinical challenge. The occurrence of an eyelash within the anterior chamber is infrequent, as illustrated by this case. We present a rare case of two eyelashes inside the anterior chamber following penetrating trauma, a scenario with few documented occurrences, especially those not related to surgical interventions. Case description: A 35-year-old male presented with symptoms of a foreign body sensation, redness, blurred vision, and photophobia two days after sustaining a wire-induced injury. Examination revealed a self-sealing corneal laceration, two eyelashes in the anterior chamber, iridocorneal adhesion, and an irregular iris. The surgical removal of the eyelashes was successfully performed. Postoperatively, the patient's visual acuity improved significantly from 20/50 to 20/20, accompanied by a marked reduction in anterior chamber inflammation. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering all types of intraocular foreign bodies, including seemingly innocuous materials like eyelashes, to diagnose ocular traumas. It highlights the critical need for prompt diagnosis and intervention to prevent long-term complications and ensure favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.