Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318732›Full record

ArticleJournal of caring sciences2024

Theory-Practice Gap During Clinical Learning: A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Nursing Students' Experiences and Perceptions.

Evelyn Hemme Tambunan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Evelyn Hemme TambunanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Science, Universitas Advent Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-4001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: One of the main areas that contributes to clarifying the significance of nursing students' performance in the clinical context is clinical learning. However, the theory-practice gap has long been an issue for clinical learning for nursing students. This study sought to explore the experiences and perceptions of nursing student when applying theory into practice during their clinical learning. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 10 senior nursing students using face-to-face interviews. These interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Three themes emerged upon analysis: academic contribution to the theory-practice gap, clinical environment contribution to the theory-practice gap, and effects of the theory-practice gap. Seven sub-themes emerged including educator contribution to the theory-practice gap, student contribution to the theory-practice gap, supporting facility contribution to the theory-practice gap, clinical instructor contribution to the theory-practice gap, clinical field contribution to the theory-practice gap, effects of the theory-practice gap to the academic field and effect of the theory-practice gap to the clinical field. Conclusion: This study provides an overview of experiences and perceptions of nursing students on theory-practice gaps during clinical learning. Further research using in-depth focus group interviews in a wider population may provide more explanatory and useful information for nursing education to better manage learning process.

Indexed as

Clinical learningExperiences and perceptionsNursing studentsTheory-practice gap

Identifiers

PMID39318732
PMCPMC11417294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.