ArticleOphthalmology science
Predicting Choroidal Nevus Transformation to Melanoma Using Machine Learning.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Differentiation Between Uveal Melanoma and Nevus Based on Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Pooled it
- Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Oncology: Differentiating Choroidal Melanocytic Lesions.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Development of a deep learning model to classify choroidal melanoma risk factors based on color fundus photographs.AJO international · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Risk Stratification of Choroidal Melanoma: A Critical Comparative Synthesis and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated Assessment of Choroidal Mass Dimensions Using Static and Dynamic Ultrasonographic Imaging.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Practical Applications, Subspecialty Evidence and Real-World Deployment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Uveal Melanoma.Anticancer research · 2025Review
- Uveal Pigmented Lesion Classification, Detection, and Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Tasks.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Assessing the Clinical Utility of Multimodal Large Language Models in the Diagnosis and Management of Pigmented Choroidal Lesions.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Non-invasive detection of choroidal melanoma via tear-derived protein corona on gold nanoparticles: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging at initial presentation. Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Participants: Patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus on the Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital (2007-2017) or Mayo Clinic Rochester (2015-2023). Methods: Multimodal imaging was obtained, including fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain OCT, and B-scan ultrasonography. Machine learning models were created (XGBoost, LGBM, Random Forest, Extra Tree) and optimized for area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Wills Eye Hospital cohort was used for training and testing (80% training-20% testing) with fivefold cross validation. The Mayo Clinic cohort provided external validation. Model performance was characterized by AUROC and area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Models were interrogated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify the features most predictive of conversion from nevus to melanoma. Differences in AUROC and AUPRC between models were tested using 10 000 bootstrap samples with replacement and results. Main Outcome Measures: Area under receiver operating curve and AUPRC for each ML model. Results: There were 2870 nevi included in the study, with conversion to melanoma confirmed in 128 cases. Simple AI Nevus Transformation System (SAINTS; XGBoost) was the top-performing model in the test cohort [pooled AUROC 0.864 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.864-0.865), pooled AUPRC 0.244 (95% CI: 0.243-0.246)] and in the external validation cohort [pooled AUROC 0.931 (95% CI: 0.930-0.931), pooled AUPRC 0.533 (95% CI: 0.531-0.535)]. Other models also had good discriminative performance: LGBM (test set pooled AUROC 0.831, validation set pooled AUROC 0.815), Random Forest (test set pooled AUROC 0.812, validation set pooled AUROC 0.866), and Extra Tree (test set pooled AUROC 0.826, validation set pooled AUROC 0.915). A model including only nevi with at least 5 years of follow-up demonstrated the best performance in AUPRC (test: pooled 0.592 (95% CI: 0.590-0.594); validation: pooled 0.656 [95% CI: 0.655-0.657]). The top 5 features in SAINTS by SHAP values were: tumor thickness, largest tumor basal diameter, tumor shape, distance to optic nerve, and subretinal fluid extent. Conclusions: We demonstrate accuracy and generalizability of a ML model for predicting choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.