Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318711›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Predicting Choroidal Nevus Transformation to Melanoma Using Machine Learning.

Prashant D Tailor, Piotr K Kopinski, Haley S D'Souza, David A Leske, Timothy W Olsen, Carol L Shields, Jerry A Shields, Lauren A Dalvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Prashant D TailorDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
Piotr K KopinskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
Haley S D'SouzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
David A LeskeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
Timothy W OlsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
Carol L ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107.
Jerry A ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107.
Lauren A DalvinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging at initial presentation. Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Participants: Patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus on the Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital (2007-2017) or Mayo Clinic Rochester (2015-2023). Methods: Multimodal imaging was obtained, including fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain OCT, and B-scan ultrasonography. Machine learning models were created (XGBoost, LGBM, Random Forest, Extra Tree) and optimized for area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Wills Eye Hospital cohort was used for training and testing (80% training-20% testing) with fivefold cross validation. The Mayo Clinic cohort provided external validation. Model performance was characterized by AUROC and area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Models were interrogated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify the features most predictive of conversion from nevus to melanoma. Differences in AUROC and AUPRC between models were tested using 10 000 bootstrap samples with replacement and results. Main Outcome Measures: Area under receiver operating curve and AUPRC for each ML model. Results: There were 2870 nevi included in the study, with conversion to melanoma confirmed in 128 cases. Simple AI Nevus Transformation System (SAINTS; XGBoost) was the top-performing model in the test cohort [pooled AUROC 0.864 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.864-0.865), pooled AUPRC 0.244 (95% CI: 0.243-0.246)] and in the external validation cohort [pooled AUROC 0.931 (95% CI: 0.930-0.931), pooled AUPRC 0.533 (95% CI: 0.531-0.535)]. Other models also had good discriminative performance: LGBM (test set pooled AUROC 0.831, validation set pooled AUROC 0.815), Random Forest (test set pooled AUROC 0.812, validation set pooled AUROC 0.866), and Extra Tree (test set pooled AUROC 0.826, validation set pooled AUROC 0.915). A model including only nevi with at least 5 years of follow-up demonstrated the best performance in AUPRC (test: pooled 0.592 (95% CI: 0.590-0.594); validation: pooled 0.656 [95% CI: 0.655-0.657]). The top 5 features in SAINTS by SHAP values were: tumor thickness, largest tumor basal diameter, tumor shape, distance to optic nerve, and subretinal fluid extent. Conclusions: We demonstrate accuracy and generalizability of a ML model for predicting choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChoroidal melanomaChoroidal nevusMachine learningOcular oncology

Identifiers

PMID39318711
PMCPMC11421339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.