Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318700›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geographical information science : IJGIS2024

Reasoning cartographic knowledge in deep learning-based map generalization with explainable AI.

Cheng Fu, Zhiyong Zhou, Yanan Xin, Robert Weibel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geographical information science : IJGIS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng FuDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-7941
Zhiyong ZhouDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-2071
Yanan XinInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-821X
Robert WeibelDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-0077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cartographic map generalization involves complex rules, and a full automation has still not been achieved, despite many efforts over the past few decades. Pioneering studies show that some map generalization tasks can be partially automated by deep neural networks (DNNs). However, DNNs are still used as black-box models in previous studies. We argue that integrating explainable AI (XAI) into a DL-based map generalization process can give more insights to develop and refine the DNNs by understanding what cartographic knowledge exactly is learned. Following an XAI framework for an empirical case study, visual analytics and quantitative experiments were applied to explain the importance of input features regarding the prediction of a pre-trained ResU-Net model. This experimental case study finds that the XAI-based visualization results can easily be interpreted by human experts. With the proposed XAI workflow, we further find that the DNN pays more attention to the building boundaries than the interior parts of the buildings. We thus suggest that boundary intersection over union is a better evaluation metric than commonly used intersection over union in qualifying raster-based map generalization results. Overall, this study shows the necessity and feasibility of integrating XAI as part of future DL-based map generalization development frameworks.

Indexed as

deep learningMap generalizationrasterU-NetXAI

Identifiers

PMID39318700
PMCPMC11418907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.