Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318698›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Evaluating the impacts of digital ECG denoising on the interpretive capabilities of healthcare professionals.

Stacey McKenna, Naomi McCord, Jordan Diven, Matthew Fitzpatrick, Holly Easlea, Austin Gibbs, Andrew R J Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stacey McKennaB-Secur Ltd, City Quays 3, 92 Donegall Quay, BT1 3FE Belfast, N. Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-4878
Naomi McCordB-Secur Ltd, City Quays 3, 92 Donegall Quay, BT1 3FE Belfast, N. Ireland.
Jordan DivenB-Secur Ltd, City Quays 3, 92 Donegall Quay, BT1 3FE Belfast, N. Ireland.
Matthew FitzpatrickB-Secur Ltd, City Quays 3, 92 Donegall Quay, BT1 3FE Belfast, N. Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-2641
Holly EasleaB-Secur Ltd, City Quays 3, 92 Donegall Quay, BT1 3FE Belfast, N. Ireland.
Austin GibbsThe Allan Lab, Jersey General Hospital, St Helier, Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-1227
Andrew R J MitchellThe Allan Lab, Jersey General Hospital, St Helier, Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-9645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an essential skill across multiple medical disciplines; yet, studies have consistently identified deficiencies in the interpretive performance of healthcare professionals linked to a variety of educational and technological factors. Despite the established correlation between noise interference and erroneous diagnoses, research evaluating the impacts of digital denoising software on clinical ECG interpretation proficiency is lacking. Methods and results: Forty-eight participants from a variety of medical professions and experience levels were prospectively recruited for this study. Participants' capabilities in classifying common cardiac rhythms were evaluated using a sequential blinded and semi-blinded interpretation protocol on a challenging set of single-lead ECG signals (42 × 10 s) pre- and post-denoising with robust, cloud-based ECG processing software. Participants' ECG rhythm interpretation performance was greatest when raw and denoised signals were viewed in a combined format that enabled comparative evaluation. The combined view resulted in a 4.9% increase in mean rhythm classification accuracy (raw: 75.7% ± 14.5% vs. combined: 80.6% ± 12.5%, Conclusion: Our findings have demonstrated that digital denoising software improves the efficacy of rhythm interpretation on single-lead ECGs, particularly when raw and denoised signals are provided in a combined viewing format, warranting further investigation into the impact of such technology on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Digital ECG denoisingECG interpretationECG noise interference

Identifiers

PMID39318698
PMCPMC11417490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.