ArticleHardwareX2024
CARETestLung: A mechanical test lung with Configurable airway Resistance, lung Elastance, and breathing efforts.
Article in HardwareX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital twins in pulmonary medicine: a scoping review of applications, benefits, and challenges.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A mechanical test lung is a crucial tool in accurately simulating patient-specific physiological responses of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV), which, in turn, offer clinicians insight into lung mechanics during MV. In particular, it can be used to facilitate better methods to identify optimal ventilator settings, modes for individual patients by providing a platform to experiment with different MV settings. This addresses the challenge of optimising MV settings caused by variability in pathological conditions and the progression of respiratory disease over time within patients. However, the accessibility and cost of versatile test lungs limit widespread adoption in clinical settings, underscoring the need for affordable alternatives. This paper presents detailed instructions for the design and construction of a replicable, cost-effective mechanical test lung. The design features 3 subsystems: 1) the lung compartment; 2) the airway; and 3) a spontaneous breathing system. A detailed tests series shows its ability to replicate clinically realistic lung elastance values ranging from 25 to 85 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.