ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Structural and functional fetal cardiac imaging using low field (0.55 T) MRI.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid, high-resolution and distortion-freeMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in a Fetus: A Rare Presentation Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Rapid, High-resolution and Distortion-freeArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using a commercially available clinical 0.55 T MRI scanner for comprehensive structural and functional fetal cardiac imaging. Methods: Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) and phase contrast (PC) sequences were optimized by Results: Using the parameters from 1.5 T as a starting point, the bSSFP sequences were optimized at 0.55 T, resulting in a 1.6-fold SNR increase and improved image contrast compared to starting parameters, as well as good visibility of most cardiac structures as rated by two experienced fetal cardiologists. The PC sequence resulted in increased SNR and reduced scan time, subsequent retrospective gating enabled successful blood flow measurements. The reconstructions and automatic great vessel segmentations showed good quality, with 18/21 segmentations requiring no or minor refinements. Blood flow measurements were within the expected range. A comparison of the UV measurements performed with ultrasound and MRI showed agreement between the two sets of measurements, with better correlation observed at lower flows. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility of low-field (0.55 T) MRI for fetal cardiac imaging. The reduced SNR at low field strength can be effectively compensated for by strategically optimizing sequence parameters. Major fetal cardiac structures and vessels were consistently visualized, and flow measurements were successfully obtained. The late gestation study demonstrated the robustness and reproducibility at low field strength. MRI performed at 0.55 T is a viable option for fetal cardiac examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.