Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Development and initial evaluation of a rigid rhinoscopy model as a pedagogic tool in veterinary medicine.

Bethany Sabatino Myerow, Jessica C Pritchard, Kathryn Kalscheur, Steve Marks, Kenneth Royal, Nicholas Thoreson, Noah Pollard, Eleanor C Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bethany Sabatino MyerowVeterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Jessica C PritchardSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Kathryn KalscheurSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Steve MarksCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Kenneth RoyalCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Nicholas ThoresonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Noah PollardSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Eleanor C HawkinsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No model exists to train the handling skills required for successful performance of rigid rhinoscopy in veterinary patients. The complex anatomy of the nasal cavity, the limited space between turbinates, and the propensity of the mucosa to bleed with slight trauma make thorough examination of a nasal cavity difficult. The goal of this study was development and initial testing of a low fidelity canine rigid rhinoscopy training model for veterinary novices. A model comprising three tubes of various lumen diameters that were connected to a conduction system was created. Each tube contained three colored stars and a number that were to be described by trainees. The model both counted contacts and audibly beeped if pressure was applied by the rhinoscope to the sides of the tube. Board-certified veterinary internists (experts) and veterinary students (novices) performed two timed simulation exercises during a single session. Participants completed a questionnaire before and after the simulations to assess model utility. There were no statistically significant differences in contacts or time to completion between novices and experts. Novices provided feedback that the model improved their ability to control the rhinoscope, helped them learn to perform rigid rhinoscopy, was enjoyable, and was appropriately challenging. Expert feedback included that the model was a potentially useful pedagogic tool for training rigid rhinoscopy, including hand control and indirect hand-eye coordination, and was appropriately challenging. We conclude that this rhinoscopy model has potential to be an effective teaching tool for novice rhinoscopists. With minor modifications, the model could provide additional challenges.

Indexed as

modelpedagogicrhinoscopysimulationtooltraining

Identifiers

PMID39318602
PMCPMC11420988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.