Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318507›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

Comparative analysis of single-cell pathway scoring methods and a novel approach.

Ruoqiao H Wang, Juilee Thakar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a pediatric immune cell atlas and characterization of CD4+ T cells in food allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruoqiao H WangDepartment of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, NY 14642, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2013-4850
Juilee ThakarDepartment of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, NY 14642, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-4183

Funding

Role of platelet- monocyte interaction in promoting pro-atherogenic state in HIV-infected individualsR01HL160229 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Meera Vir Singh, Juilee Thakar · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell gene set analysis (scGSA) provides a useful approach for quantifying molecular functions and pathways in high-throughput transcriptomic data, facilitating the biological interpretation of complex human datasets. However, various factors such as gene set size, quality of the gene sets and the dropouts impact the performance of scGSA. To address these limitations, we present a single-cell Pathway Score (scPS) method to measure gene set activity at single-cell resolution. Furthermore, we benchmark our method with six other methods: AUCell, AddModuleScore, JASMINE, UCell, SCSE and ssGSEA. The comparison across all the methods using two different simulation approaches highlights the effect of cell count, gene set size, noise, condition-specific genes and zero imputation on their performance. The results of our study indicate that the scPS is comparable with other single-cell scoring methods and detects fewer false positives. Importantly, this work reveals critical variables in the scGSA.

Identifiers

PMID39318507
PMCPMC11420841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.