Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318486›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Surgical Outcomes and Factors Related to Their Success of Infantile Esotropia in a Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Study.

Worapot Srimanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Worapot SrimananOphthalmology Division, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2088-8639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of surgical intervention for infantile esotropia at a tertiary care hospital. Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with esotropia who underwent surgical correction at our tertiary hospital between January 2013 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative ocular alignment, surgical techniques employed, complications or reoperations, and factors related to successful surgery were analyzed. Results: The study included 77 participants with an average age of 9.54 ± 10.87 years at the time of surgery. Postoperatively, 71.4% (55/77) patients achieved successful alignment, which was defined as an ocular deviation of ≤10 prism diopters (PD), at the final follow-up. The average follow-up period was 12 months, during which no complications were noted. Reoperation was required in 15.6% (12/77) patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that having a smaller preoperative deviation of <50 PD positively influenced the success of strabismus surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% CI, 2.04-24.86). Conclusion: The surgical correction of infantile esotropia in a tertiary care setting yielded favorable alignment outcomes in most cases, with no complications and a low reoperation rate. A preoperative angle of <50 PD emerged as a prognostic factor for successful surgical outcomes in this population. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to evaluate the long-term stability of these outcomes and identify additional influencing factors.

Indexed as

esotropiafactorstrabismussuccesssurgery

Identifiers

PMID39318486
PMCPMC11421460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.