Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318401›Full record

ArticleLanguage learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development2024

More Than Looks: Exploring Methods to Test Phonological Discrimination in the Sign Language Kata Kolok.

Hannah Lutzenberger, Marisa Casillas, Paula Fikkert, Onno Crasborn, Connie de Vos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah LutzenbergerTilburg Center for Cognition and Communication, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-4060
Marisa CasillasLanguage Development Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5417-0505
Paula FikkertCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7317-2100
Onno CrasbornCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-9097
Connie de VosDepartment of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-4313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of diversity in the language sciences has increasingly been criticized as it holds the potential for producing flawed theories. Research on (i) geographically diverse language communities and (ii) on sign languages is necessary to corroborate, sharpen, and extend existing theories. This study contributes a case study of adapting a well-established paradigm to study the acquisition of sign phonology in Kata Kolok, a sign language of rural Bali, Indonesia. We conducted an experiment modeled after the familiarization paradigm with child signers of Kata Kolok. Traditional analyses of looking time did not yield significant differences between signing and non-signing children. Yet, additional behavioral analyses (attention, eye contact, hand behavior) suggest that children who are signers and those who are non-signers, as well as those who are hearing and those who are deaf, interact differently with the task. This study suggests limitations of the paradigm due to the ecology of sign languages and the sociocultural characteristics of the sample, calling for a mixed-methods approach. Ultimately, this paper aims to elucidate the diversity of adaptations necessary for experimental design, procedure, and analysis, and to offer a critical reflection on the contribution of similar efforts and the diversification of the field.

Identifiers

PMID39318401
PMCPMC11418908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.