ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Clinician actions in response to Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) screening.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences : A Cross-Sectional Study among Inpatients at Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching Hospital in Rwanda.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- The Influence of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Trauma Informed Care Among Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Adverse Childhood Experiences(ACEs) have a powerful influence on mental health, physical health, and life expectancy. Screening for ACEs and the clinician response to ACEs are critical to addressing the health and well-being of children; however, little is known about the actions clinicians take in response to ACE screening. Therefore, we aimed to examine clinician responses to ACE screening at five California pediatric clinics in a large public health care system. Methods: Patient demographics, indicators of social and behavioral determinants of health (e.g., housing insecurity), the number of ACEs endorsed on a screening instrument, and the actions clinicians took in response to each ACE screen were collected. Data was collected from May to October 2021. These data were used to examine the association between number of ACEs reported and clinician response, controlling for patient demographics and their social and behavioral determinants of health using multiple logistic regression. Results: Five participating pediatric clinics conducted 2,652 ACE screens in six-months. Clinicians documented an action twice as often when ACEs were present, after controlling for patient demographics and their social and behavioral determinants of health (odds ratio(OR) = 2.2, 95 % confidence interval(CI): 1.5-3.3, p-value < 0.0001). Clinicians were three times more likely to record referrals to mental health clinicians, social workers, and community organizations relative to anticipatory guidance when the number of ACEs increased from one to three to four or more (OR=3.2, 95 %CI: 1.6-6.5, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Findings provide early information that ACE screening results are associated with patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.