Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318363›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2024

Exploring the potent enhancement effects of plyometric training on vertical jumping and sprinting ability in sports individuals.

Lin Xie, Jiayong Chen, Jing Dai, Wenfeng Zhang, Lunxin Chen, Jian Sun, Xiang Gao, Junyi Song, Hailun Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lin XieDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayong ChenDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing DaiDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenfeng ZhangSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Lunxin ChenDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian SunSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang GaoSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Junyi SongSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Hailun ShenZhejiang Technical Institute of Economics, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis examines the impact of different combinations of plyometric training (complexity, training volume, and rest intervals) on immediate vertical jump and sprint performance in athletes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases, and Cochrane guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Review Manager 5.4 software was employed to analyze outcome measures. Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving 293 participants were included. Results: Single plyometric training-induced post-activation potentiation (PAP) had a slight positive effect on vertical jump performance [SMD = -0.24, 95% CI (-0.38, -0.1), Conclusion: Plyometric training as an activation method has significant enhancing effects, depending on training complexity, volume, and rest intervals.

Indexed as

explosive powerplyometric trainingpost-activation performance enhancementpost-activation potentiationsprint

Identifiers

PMID39318363
PMCPMC11420559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.