Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318228›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

The Right to Rehabilitation for People With Dementia: A Codesign Approach to Barriers and Solutions.

Natasha Layton, Catherine Devanny, Keith Hill, Kate Swaffer, Grant Russell, Lee-Fay Low, Den-Ching A Lee, Monica Cations, Helen Skouteris, Claire Mc O'Connor and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-Verbal Communication in Nursing Home Settings.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Natasha LaytonRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8069
Catherine DevannyNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-2183-8574
Keith HillRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-0308
Kate SwafferUniversity of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8963-2431
Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-2355
Lee-Fay LowFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-3525
Den-Ching A LeeRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2693-8606
Monica CationsCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-0463
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-5750
Claire Mc O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-708X
Taya A CollyerNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8612-1724
Barbara Barbosa NevesSydney Centre for Healthy Societies, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-4322
Nadine E AndrewNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-2840
Terry HainesNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-6154
Velandai K SrikanthNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-8981
Alan PetersenSociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2755-0227
Michele L CallisayaNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-1622

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund (Australia) Dementia Ageing and Aged Care Mission #2015947.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with dementia of all ages have a human right to equal access to quality health care. Despite evidence regarding its effectiveness, many people living with dementia are unable to access rehabilitation for promoting function and quality of life. Conducted in Australia, this study was designed to (1) explore barriers to access to dementia rehabilitation and (2) identify solutions that improve access to rehabilitation.

methodsPeople living with dementia (n = 5) and care partners (n = 8) and health professionals (n = 13) were recruited nationally. Experience-based codesign across three virtual workshops was used to understand barriers and design solutions to improve access to rehabilitation treatments. Socio-ecological analyses, using the Levesque Access to Health care framework, were applied to findings regarding barriers and to aid selection of solutions.

resultsThere was high attendance (92.3%) across the three workshops. Barriers were identified at a user level (including lack of knowledge, transport, cost and difficulty navigating the health, aged care and disability sectors) and health service level (including health professional low dementia knowledge and negative attitudes, inequitable funding models and non-existent or fragmented services). Solutions focused on widespread dementia education and training, including ensuring that people with dementia and their care partners know about rehabilitation therapies and that health professionals, aged care and disability co-ordinators know how to refer to and deliver rehabilitation interventions. Dementia care navigators, changes to Australia's public funding models and specific dementia rehabilitation programmes were also recommended.

conclusionsBarriers to accessing rehabilitation for people with dementia exist at multiple levels and will require a whole-community and systems approach to ensure change. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with living experience (preferred term by those involved) were involved at two levels within this research. A Chief Investigator living with dementia was involved in the design of the study and writing of the manuscript. People with living experience, care partners and service providers were participants in the codesign process to identify barriers and design potential solutions.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth Services AccessibilityAgedAustraliaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Lifeallied health occupationsdementiageneral practicehealthcare disparitieslived experiencereablementrehabilitationstigma

Identifiers

PMID39318228
PMCPMC11422665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.