Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318214›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug targets2024

Advances in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Study of Datasets, Data Preprocessing Techniques, and Model Architectures.

Gelany Aly Abdelkader, Jeong-Dong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug targets, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning to Predict CDK4 Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gelany Aly AbdelkaderDepartment of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Sun Moon University, Asan 31460, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0003-3195-0842
Jeong-Dong KimDepartment of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Sun Moon University, Asan 31460, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5113-221X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug discovery is a complex and expensive procedure involving several timely and costly phases through which new potential pharmaceutical compounds must pass to get approved. One of these critical steps is the identification and optimization of lead compounds, which has been made more accessible by the introduction of computational methods, including deep learning (DL) techniques. Diverse DL model architectures have been put forward to learn the vast landscape of interaction between proteins and ligands and predict their affinity, helping in the identification of lead compounds.

objectiveThis survey fills a gap in previous research by comprehensively analyzing the most commonly used datasets and discussing their quality and limitations. It also offers a comprehensive classification of the most recent DL methods in the context of protein-ligand binding affinity prediction (BAP), providing a fresh perspective on this evolving field.

methodsWe thoroughly examine commonly used datasets for BAP and their inherent characteristics. Our exploration extends to various preprocessing steps and DL techniques, including graph neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and transformers, which are found in the literature. We conducted extensive literature research to ensure that the most recent deep learning approaches for BAP were included by the time of writing this manuscript.

resultsThe systematic approach used for the present study highlighted inherent challenges to BAP via DL, such as data quality, model interpretability, and explainability, and proposed considerations for future research directions. We present valuable insights to accelerate the development of more effective and reliable DL models for BAP within the research community.

conclusionThe present study can considerably enhance future research on predicting affinity between protein and ligand molecules, hence further improving the overall drug development process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryProtein BindingProteinsComputational BiologyHumansLigandsNeural Networks, ComputerLigandsProteinscompound-protein interactionDeep learningDNA sequences.drug discoverydrug repurposingprotein-ligand binding affinity

Identifiers

PMID39318214
PMCPMC11774311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.