ReviewCurrent drug targets2024
Advances in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Study of Datasets, Data Preprocessing Techniques, and Model Architectures.
Review in Current drug targets, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-guided compound prioritization strategy for virtual screening identifies putative binders for the nuclear receptor LRH-1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting drug-target interactions and binding affinity using an optimized deep learning approach.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction Based on Noncovalent Interactions.ACS omega · 2026Article
- cncFinder: A graph-attention-network-based interpretable learning model to identify bifunctional long non-coding RNAs.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- PepGraphormer: an ESM-GAT hybrid deep learning framework for antimicrobial peptide prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- RWRGDR: Random Walk and GraphSAGE-based Framework for Enhanced Drug Repositioning.Current drug targets · 2026Article
- Machine Learning to Predict CDK4 Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- In silico discovery of umami peptides: From sequence-based intelligent models to structure-function mechanistic insight.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- BridgeNet: a high-efficiency framework integrating sequence and structure for protein and enzyme function prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PCBert-Kla: an efficient prediction method for lysine lactylation sites based on ProtBert and fusion of physicochemical features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Exploring claudin proteins: from sequence motifs to their impact on tight junction-mediated signaling pathways.Amino acids · 2025Review
- BertADP: a fine-tuned protein language model for anti-diabetic peptide prediction.BMC biology · 2025Article
- From Detection to Prediction: Advances in m6A Methylation Analysis Through Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Implications in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Recent advances in deep learning for protein-protein interaction: a review.BioData mining · 2025Review
- NeuroScale: evolutional scale-based protein language models enable prediction of neuropeptides.BMC biology · 2025Article
- PBertKla: a protein large language model for predicting human lysine lactylation sites.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Towards Precision Aging Biology: Single-Cell Multi-Omics and Advanced AI-Driven Strategies.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Evaluating data partitioning strategies for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energy changes in mutated proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug discovery is a complex and expensive procedure involving several timely and costly phases through which new potential pharmaceutical compounds must pass to get approved. One of these critical steps is the identification and optimization of lead compounds, which has been made more accessible by the introduction of computational methods, including deep learning (DL) techniques. Diverse DL model architectures have been put forward to learn the vast landscape of interaction between proteins and ligands and predict their affinity, helping in the identification of lead compounds.
objectiveThis survey fills a gap in previous research by comprehensively analyzing the most commonly used datasets and discussing their quality and limitations. It also offers a comprehensive classification of the most recent DL methods in the context of protein-ligand binding affinity prediction (BAP), providing a fresh perspective on this evolving field.
methodsWe thoroughly examine commonly used datasets for BAP and their inherent characteristics. Our exploration extends to various preprocessing steps and DL techniques, including graph neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and transformers, which are found in the literature. We conducted extensive literature research to ensure that the most recent deep learning approaches for BAP were included by the time of writing this manuscript.
resultsThe systematic approach used for the present study highlighted inherent challenges to BAP via DL, such as data quality, model interpretability, and explainability, and proposed considerations for future research directions. We present valuable insights to accelerate the development of more effective and reliable DL models for BAP within the research community.
conclusionThe present study can considerably enhance future research on predicting affinity between protein and ligand molecules, hence further improving the overall drug development process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.