Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318211›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2026

An Overview of Microfluidic Phenotype Separation of Bacteria.

Vimala Juliet, Sanchanna Ganesan, Chinnapalli Likith Kumar, Muthumareeswaran Muthuramamoorthy, Khalid E Alzahrani, Abdullah N Alodhayb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vimala JulietDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603202, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3689-8479
Sanchanna GanesanDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603202, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8684-7234
Chinnapalli Likith KumarDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 603202, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3453-0061
Muthumareeswaran MuthuramamoorthyKing Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3716-1185
Khalid E AlzahraniKing Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah N AlodhaybKing Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0202-8712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of microfluidics technology, it is now possible in medical biotechnology to examine clinical and rapid diagnostic operations involving pathogens, like bacteria and viruses. The method of separating bacteria from complicated homogeneous and heterogeneous samples is one of the most important steps in the diagnostic process. The microfluidic technology for bacterial separation offers a better and more promising platform by combining several physical properties and characteristics of bacteria. In contrast, the conventional method is time-consuming, limited to a few cell properties, and necessitates the completion of several challenging steps and processes involving skilled manpower. The microfluidics platform also has a number of advantages, including small-scale size, low cost, high efficiency, and simultaneous detection and execution of further steps. This enables cell separation, analysis, and experimental processing on a single chip. In this paper, we have analysed the mechanism of the bacterial separation process depending on phenocharacteristics along with their benefits, constraints, and applications. In addition, the performance metrics needed for the separation of the devices along with the challenges and future possibilities of developed devices, which are described in the literature, are discussed in detail. Thus, this review offers a holistic analysis of the separation of bacteria using microfluidic technology.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsHumansPhenotypeBacteriadiagnostic processinfectious disease.microfluidicsphenotypeseparation mechanism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.