Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318207›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2025

Multiplex PCR System for the Diagnosis of Plague.

Wenfang Wang, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Yu, Zhanli Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In Vitro Selection of Antibodies TargetingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenfang WangInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Disease-Related Biomarkers, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.
Xiaoxue ZhangInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Disease-Related Biomarkers, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.
Hui YuInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Disease-Related Biomarkers, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.
Zhanli WangInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Disease-Related Biomarkers, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China.

Funding

Key Scientific and Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China 2021ZD0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plague caused by Yersinia pestis has a high case fatality rate. It is often transmitted from person to person through mosquito bites, causing serious disease transmission. Due to its clinical symptoms being very similar to influenza, it is difficult to detect by people. Traditional detection methods for Y. pestis mainly include bacterial culture and serological identification, which are cumbersome and require high experimental conditions. Therefore, a fast and effective detection method is very important. At present, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the methods for rapid detection of Y. pestis. In this review, we focus on the application, advantages, and disadvantages of multiplex PCR technology in clinical detection.

Indexed as

Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPlagueYersinia pestisAnimalsHumansfatality ratemosquito bitesMultiplex PCRplagueYersinia pestiszoonotic bacteria.

Identifiers

PMID39318207
PMCPMC12645103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.