ReviewCurrent drug targets2025
Two Decades Rituximab Therapy in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Vasculitis.
Review in Current drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Th17/Treg axis: a key to understanding and treating autoimmune disorders.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Cyclophosphamide treatment with a comparison in both pediatric rheumatology and pediatric nephrology practices.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remission failure and relapse numerate as one of the main problems in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAVs). The need for new agents that provide effective and safe induction accompanied by sustained remission seems to be urgent in clinical care. The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) for AAVs therapy has been reported in various studies. RTX therapy offers several advantages to treating AAVs patients compared to other therapeutic approaches including reduction of Glucocorticoids (GCs) and conventional Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) usage during both the induction of remission and maintenance phases. This reduction can lead to a lower rate of serious complications making RTX therapy a safer option. It seems that RTX may provide improved clinical outcomes in these patients mediated via B-lymphocyte depletion, Proteinase 3-antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (PR3-ANCA), and myeloperoxidase-antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA) titers reduction. In this regard, some uncertainties have been reported to validate the association between such depletion and clinical improvement, as suggested by other sources of autoreactive B cells that did not target with RTX. Due to the prolonged B cell depletion, fixed intervals and adjusted dosage of RTX may be required in patients with AAVs. In this narrative review, we aimed to insight better understand regarding the efficacy of RTX for effective induction and sustained remission in patients with AAVs. It seems that discovering new biomarkers predicting relapse in AAVs patients can lead to future targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39318005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.