ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2024
CAR T-cells for pediatric solid tumors: where to go from here?
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineered cell therapies for pediatric solid tumors: unmet needs and a measurement-integrated approach.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for solid tumors in pediatric patients: current breakthroughs, dilemmas, and strategies.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- A radiopharmaceutical enhances CAR T cells against radio-sensitive and radio-resistant neuroblastoma by tumor sensitization and TME remodeling.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- ENPP3 CAR T cells combined with CD206 modulation suppress adrenocortical carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- CAR-T cell therapy for pediatric solid tumors: armored CAR-T cells and beyond.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- CAR-engineered cell therapies: current understandings and future perspectives.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the great success that chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have had in patients with B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma, they continue to have limited efficacy against most solid tumors. Especially in the pediatric population, pre- and post-treatment biopsies are rarely performed due to ethical reasons, and thus, our understanding is still very limited regarding the mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment by which tumor cells exclude effectors and attract immune-suppressive cells. Nevertheless, based on the principles that are known, current T-cell engineering has leveraged some of these processes and created more potent CAR T-cells. The recent discovery of new oncofetal antigens and progress made in CAR design have expanded the potential pool of candidate antigens for therapeutic development. The most promising approaches to enhance CAR T-cells are novel CAR gating strategies, creative ways of cytokine delivery to the TME without enhancing systemic toxicity, and hijacking the chemokine axis of tumors for migratory purposes. With these new modifications, the next step in the era of CAR T-cell development will be the clinical validation of these promising preclinical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.