ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Losartan in Situ Forming Gel as a New Treatment for Hypertrophic Scars.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Effect of Niclosamide versus Triamcinolone on Rabbit Ear Model of Hypertrophic Scar.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic scars are defined as visible lesions formed by excessive wound healing that cause cosmetic and, in some cases, functional challenges in patients. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of intralesional injections of losartan-loaded in situ forming gel and compare it with the common treatment (triamcinolone) in preventing scar formation. The formulation was prepared using a thermosensitive PLGA-PEG-PLGA triblock copolymer. Ear scar tissue in rabbits represented the hypertrophic scar, and the animals were treated with three treatments in three groups. Nine weeks following the single treatment, images of the scars were obtained and quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ and light microscopy was used to evaluate the fibroblast cell number, vascularization, inflammation and collagen deposition and fibrosis in H&E-stained sample tissue. According to the results based on the ImageJ and the Vancouver criteria, the losartan in situ forming gel (F-LG) indicated significantly higher improving effects on decreased vascularity and pigmentation in comparison with triamcinolone (F-TA) and placebo as a control (F-Ctl), although the effect F-LG was almost similar to F-TA on pliability and scar height, and they were better than the control. Histological findings showed F-LG and F-TA have less inflammatory and fibroblast cells compared to F-Ctl. Also, results indicated the dermal layers of the F-TA and F-LG groups' scar were thinner, and the deposition of collagens was reduced compared to the control. Consequently, F-LG was found to be an effective treatment in reducing scarring and promoting wound healing.No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39317863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.