ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2024
Beyond presence of symptoms: Self-reported psychosocial distress interference among outpatient youth with cancer and other life-limiting conditions.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival in children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions-a nationwide cohort study.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Delivering Care Consistent With the Psychosocial Standards-Provider Report: Implementing the Standards Together-Engaging Parents and Providers in Psychosocial Care (iSTEPPP) Study.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYouth with life-limiting conditions face significant psychosocial challenges (e.g., symptoms of anxiety, depression, and pain) throughout illness and treatment. Without appropriate intervention, this can negatively affect long-term outcomes (e.g., disease management, health-related quality of life). Prompt identification and appropriate attention to distress can mitigate these effects. We aimed to determine the prevalence and severity of distress interference among outpatient youth with cancer and other life-limiting conditions, using the Checking IN screener. PROCEDURE: Within a larger study across four hospital centers, English-speaking pediatric outpatients aged 8-21, and a caregiver-proxy-reporter, completed a brief distress screener. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the sample and evaluate reported distress symptoms.
resultsChecking IN was completed by 100 participants, aged 8-21 (M = 14.27, SD = 3.81); caregivers completed an equivalent proxy screener. Youth most frequently endorsed fatigue (moderate: n = 50, 50.0%; high: n = 21, 21.0%), paying attention (moderate: n = 45, 45.0%; high: n = 16, 16.0%), and sleep difficulty (moderate: n = 46, 46.0%; high: n = 13; 13.0%) as problematic. Caregivers proxy reported fatigue (moderate: n = 46, 46.0%; high: n = 32, 32.0%), worry (moderate: n = 56, 56.0%; high: n = 10, 10.0%), and sleep difficulty (moderate: n = 47, 47.0%; high: n = 14; 14.0%) as most problematic. Group differences between youth and caregiver responses were not significant.
conclusionsYouth self-report via Checking IN can detect psychosocial distress interference. By directing resources based on real-time assessment of symptom interference, there is potential to simplify outpatient psychosocial screening and improve referral timeliness and specificity, thus allowing for more effective attention to evolving symptoms of distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.