SynthesisLasers in medical science2024
Effects of high-intensity laser therapy on subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of high-intensity laser therapy on supraspinatus tendon elasticity in subacromial impingement syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
- Near-infrared light-induced transcranial photobiomodulation enhances the visual pathway's function in healthy volunteers.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify, critically appraise, and summarize the effects of high-intensity laser therapy on subacromial impingement syndrome. Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 1, 2024. Clinical trials comparing the effects of high-intensity laser therapy to conventional therapy are eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effects of high-intensity laser therapy. Five randomized controlled trials and one controlled clinical trial were included, with a total of 284 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. All included studies were evaluated as good or above for quality assessment. Compared to conventional therapy, high-intensity laser therapy demonstrated significantly better outcomes for pain at both post-intervention (SMD = -1.01, 95%CI = -1.85 to -0.17) and three-month post-intervention (SMD = -0.51, 95%CI = -0.90 to -0.13); shoulder and arm function at both post-intervention (SMD = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.14 to 0.66) and three-month post-intervention (SMD = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.06 to 0.84); shoulder abduction active range of motion (SMD = 3.26, 95%CI = 0.49 to 6.03). No significant difference was found for shoulder flexion and external rotation range of motion. This review highlights the promising effects of high-intensity laser therapy for the rehabilitation of subacromial impingement syndrome. Rehabilitation professionals and policymakers should increase their awareness of high-intensity laser therapy as an emerging technology that may facilitate greater outcomes than current widespread standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39317844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.